<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To (ASP.NET)MVC or not to MVC (or, ASP.NET MVC Hyperlink Acupuncture)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/</link>
	<description>Strange noises from the mind of Nathan Stults...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:34:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: r4 games</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>r4 games</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/29/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/#comment-441</guid>
		<description>Thanx for the valuable information. Can you please provide information over MVC? I was looking for it. I couldn&#039;t understand what I got from Internet. Please provide links to related topics if possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx for the valuable information. Can you please provide information over MVC? I was looking for it. I couldn&#39;t understand what I got from Internet. Please provide links to related topics if possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r4 games</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/comment-page-1/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>r4 games</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/29/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Thanx for the valuable information. Can you please provide information over MVC? I was looking for it. I couldn&#039;t understand what I got from Internet. Please provide links to related topics if possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx for the valuable information. Can you please provide information over MVC? I was looking for it. I couldn&#39;t understand what I got from Internet. Please provide links to related topics if possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Hounshell</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hounshell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/29/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/#comment-371</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://aspdotnetmvc.com&quot;&gt;aspdotnetmvc.com&lt;/a&gt; site. I&#039;m the person who built and maintains the site and I agree that there is way too much information in the main feed, primarily because of all the stuff picked up in the Buzz section (pulling from &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.asp.net&quot;&gt;forums.asp.net&lt;/a&gt;, twitter, friendfeed, digg, dotnetkicks, etc). That section is not manually culled so it tends to overpower the rest. I would suggest subscribing to the individual sections minus the Buzz (blogs, news, video, and InAction) instead of the entire aggregate to lessen the noise. Actually now that I think about it I should probably put another aggregate feed together for everything except the Buzz for those who don&#039;t want to drink from the firehose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention about the <a href="http://aspdotnetmvc.com">aspdotnetmvc.com</a> site. I&#39;m the person who built and maintains the site and I agree that there is way too much information in the main feed, primarily because of all the stuff picked up in the Buzz section (pulling from <a href="http://forums.asp.net">forums.asp.net</a>, twitter, friendfeed, digg, dotnetkicks, etc). That section is not manually culled so it tends to overpower the rest. I would suggest subscribing to the individual sections minus the Buzz (blogs, news, video, and InAction) instead of the entire aggregate to lessen the noise. Actually now that I think about it I should probably put another aggregate feed together for everything except the Buzz for those who don&#39;t want to drink from the firehose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eibrahim</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>eibrahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/29/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/#comment-344</guid>
		<description>I think this might help &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/07/deciding-between-aspnet-mvc-and-webforms/&quot;&gt;http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/07/deciding-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would like to hear your opinion on it too.  Should I add more questions?  Does it even make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this might help <a href="http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/07/deciding-between-aspnet-mvc-and-webforms/"></a><a href="http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/07/deciding-.." rel="nofollow">http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/07/deciding-..</a>.</p>
<p>I would like to hear your opinion on it too.  Should I add more questions?  Does it even make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deependra Solanky</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Deependra Solanky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 06:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/29/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Very nice article, Nathan. There are a lot of useful links in this especially for newbies in ASP.NET MVC like me.
Thanks for posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice article, Nathan. There are a lot of useful links in this especially for newbies in ASP.NET MVC like me.<br />
Thanks for posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/29/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Harry, not a tweeter. I opened an account once, but the only thing it really did for my was disrupt my ability to concentrate even more than my RSS reader and e-mail already manage to do :) So are you guys working on some MVC stuff over there at DX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry, not a tweeter. I opened an account once, but the only thing it really did for my was disrupt my ability to concentrate even more than my RSS reader and e-mail already manage to do <img src='http://www.thefreakparade.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  So are you guys working on some MVC stuff over there at DX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mehul Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Mehul Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/29/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Nathan, good post. Lot&#039;s of links which I&#039;ll have to check out later. Are you on twitter? http://twitter.com/mehulharry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan, good post. Lot&#8217;s of links which I&#8217;ll have to check out later. Are you on twitter? <a href="http://twitter.com/mehulharry" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/mehulharry</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASP.NET MVC Archived Blog Posts, Page 1</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>ASP.NET MVC Archived Blog Posts, Page 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/29/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/#comment-236</guid>
		<description>[...] to VoteTo (ASP.NET)MVC or not to MVC (or, ASP.NET MVC Hyperlink Acupuncture) (7/29/2008)Tuesday, July 29, 2008 from hsidev.wordpress.comThe open source framework Castle Monorail has an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to VoteTo (ASP.NET)MVC or not to MVC (or, ASP.NET MVC Hyperlink Acupuncture) (7/29/2008)Tuesday, July 29, 2008 from hsidev.wordpress.comThe open source framework Castle Monorail has an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Ezell</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Ezell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/29/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/#comment-232</guid>
		<description>I think you are right on with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are right on with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreakparade.com/2008/07/29/to-aspnetmvc-or-not-to-mvc-or-aspnet-mvc-hyperlink-acupuncture/#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Jesse, those are good points. I think ASP.NET MVC and MVC in general is about more than just control, although that plays a big role. Testability, built in support for IoC containers, a formalized separation of concerns, the tremendous weight loss achieved by dumping View State are also important considerations. I would almost say that if you want to realize an architecture for your app that DOES cleanly and intelligently keep business logic or data access out of your business layers you&#039;re developers need *more* experience and discipline if they are using ASP.NET WebForms than if they are using MVC, because in WebForms it is extremely easy for business logic and data access concerns to start creeping into bed with the view logic if you aren&#039;t very careful. I also tend to believe that the abstraction of Web Forms won&#039;t keep you safe from HTML - unless you&#039;re building some intranet app that is little more than scaffolding over a database - I&#039;ve spent as much time tweaking HTML tags using classic ASP.NET as writing server side code, and even more time than that worrying about the ID&#039;s that were generate :) ). Not to say ASP.NET WebForms don&#039;t have their merits or that the abstraction isn&#039;t useful in many cases, just that there may be more to consider than just if (ControlFreak) MVC else (ClassicAspNet).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse, those are good points. I think ASP.NET MVC and MVC in general is about more than just control, although that plays a big role. Testability, built in support for IoC containers, a formalized separation of concerns, the tremendous weight loss achieved by dumping View State are also important considerations. I would almost say that if you want to realize an architecture for your app that DOES cleanly and intelligently keep business logic or data access out of your business layers you&#8217;re developers need *more* experience and discipline if they are using ASP.NET WebForms than if they are using MVC, because in WebForms it is extremely easy for business logic and data access concerns to start creeping into bed with the view logic if you aren&#8217;t very careful. I also tend to believe that the abstraction of Web Forms won&#8217;t keep you safe from HTML &#8211; unless you&#8217;re building some intranet app that is little more than scaffolding over a database &#8211; I&#8217;ve spent as much time tweaking HTML tags using classic ASP.NET as writing server side code, and even more time than that worrying about the ID&#8217;s that were generate <img src='http://www.thefreakparade.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ). Not to say ASP.NET WebForms don&#8217;t have their merits or that the abstraction isn&#8217;t useful in many cases, just that there may be more to consider than just if (ControlFreak) MVC else (ClassicAspNet).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
